paulhume
Registered Member
Offline
Posts: 454
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: 2010/Mar/05 @ 04:21:04 » |
|
Well, two cents worth...
You get here into the whole spread of meaning for the term "witchcraft."
Let's leave aside Wicca and its descendants (on both sides of the blanket). Either you have explicit theism, whether the Wiccans involved consider their Gods to be metaphors or actualities. or you have an assumed non-theism which then proceeds to dress up the phenomenal universe as a Deity instead (again, either assigning it a personality or treating as some metaphor for a spiritual insight).
So, witchcraft: - a spellcraft within a given culture, generally with the connotation or even definition that it is outside the sphere of action permitted by that culture. A Roman priest of the Gods was not - by Roman definitions - a witch. Witchcraft (maleficia, among other terms) was not licensed by the state religion, involved popular and widespread charms like "cursing bowls," illicit astrology (eg. casting a chart for the Imperial family), etc.
- witches in classical Pagan cultures (and this persists in modern cultures which have an active witchcraft belief, from African animism to Shinto to some sects of Buddhism to some sects of Hinduism to Native American tribal religions like that of the Navaho) are not, as a rule, connected with the Gods of those cultures, though sometimes, as in the Christian model of the witch in European history, witches may be associated with the "bad" God or Gods. The witch (using the word as the most obvious rendition of the local word for this kind of magician) is a harmful individual, who uses magical powers to the harm of others and the advancement of their own fortunes. People who have, or claim to have, a mandate from the local religion are involved in countering witchcraft, either in ritual or in social actions. Whether you are talking about the inquisitors, or Matthew Hopkins, or a local witch smeller, or a travelling yamabushi who acts as an exorcist against families using fox or centipede magic on the neighbors, or a Navaho singer working a Way to counter the machinations of a skinwalker, or a mob with torches and pitchforks, the larger culture mobilizes against the witch.
In classical Pagan cultures, or modern ones, identity with the powers of nature (if those are conceived of as separate from the local Gods), and certainly with any kind of Divine power, was not the general sphere of action of the witch. You certainly had, in some cases, individuals who worked in that territory without being members of an established religion. During much of the pagan era in the Scandinavian region, you might proclaim yourself a godhi (God-man) and if your neighbors treated you like one, then you were. Where there was a state religion (Egypt, Greece, Rome, etc.) the local powers that be sharply defined areas that were appropriate for this kind of "private enterprise." An Egyptian who claimed to be a priest of Amon (for example) better have been an officially recognized priest of Amon, or else the local priests of Amon were going to have a brief word with him on the subject, which would move any final decision to the Field of Reeds. But most heads of household had certain areas where they acted in a religious role for their families. Ditto the Graeco-Roman cultures. A family that maintains a local shrine to the local Kami fulfill a priestly function in Japan, but are not recognized throughout the country as Shinto clergy the way a priest/ess at the Meiji Shrine or the Shrine of Amaterasu at Ise will be.
And calling any of these, in their time or place, by the local word which could most closely be rendered into English as "witch," was at least insulting, probably a fighting word, and potentially a criminal act punishable in a number of nasty ways.
So if you want to call a body of technique, whether it is a fancy set of theories about magic, or a body of lore for local charms and curses, and ever-filled purses, witchcraft, you are really in the line established by Murray and Gardner (treading in some footsteps laid down by Michelet and others), looking at the proposition that the witch in Christian Europe was a combination of Pagan survival and rebel with a cause. And it is quite safe to do so...in modern Euro-American cultures.
|